Phrasing seems to be one of those things in worship music that is overlooked. You never really think about it unless it is done poorly. I think it’s because as worship leaders/band members, we do not like to think of our music as performances. Not to say that this is a bad thing, however, we tend to take this to the extreme and forget about the basics of musicianship and needing to play excellently. Just because it’s not a performance, doesn’t mean we don’t play musically or play our best. Poorly done music is very distracting and not worshipful.
Phrasing is what makes music beautiful and powerful. When a preacher is preparing for a sermon, he will carefully consider how to vary his voice in volume and pitch to keep his audience engaged and focused on the message. A monotonous preacher is not engaging and I would argue, ineffective. In the same way, worship leaders should also carefully consider phrasing. It’s a good way to help the congregation understand the organization of a song and the direction which the music is heading. For example, when the band is playing an interlude in a song, the structure of the interlude should be made apparent to the listeners so that they have a good feel for when the next verse or bridge is coming up.
How do we do that?
Yup, you guessed it. It’s about phrasing.
But before we proceed with this discussion, let’s define some of these terms.
1. Phrase: “a musical thought ending with a partial or complete point of rest”
2. Phrasing: how these phrases are performed. Often, but not always, these phrases will come in pairs.
3. Period: two phrases, usually of the same length, forming a complete musical thought These phrases usually form a question/answer relationship in that the second phrase complements the first phrase.
4. Antecedent: the first phrase will have a weaker cadence than the second.
5. Consequent: the second phrase has a stronger cadence and lets the listener know that this is the end of the phrase.
Here’s a simple illustration of an antecedent/consequent phrase from the hymn, Man of Sorrows:
If you take a look, you’ll notice that the structure of both of the phrases are very similar. The melody and harmony of the first phrase feels unfinished until the second phrase answers it. The second phrase ends in the tonic while the first phrase ends in the dominant.
(There are classifications of these periods such as parallel, contrasting, sequential, or inverted.)
In the next post, we’ll talk about how to apply the music theory behind phrasing in worship music.

